I disagree that you're more open-minded about this than most other people, unless you're reversing the usual order of things. Most people take it as a given that women work, and only a minority think that they should stay home with the kids for the duration of their childhood. Your position seems to begin from taking the latter as a given, with women's working as being at issue. Most people would have to be pretty open-minded not to think you're living in a time warp or in some fundamentalist cult in the mountains. Do you even get TV in your remote commune? Do you have access to newspapers and books?
___Most women, like most men, like to work because it's fulfilling. It also gets them out into society, where they can have interesting encounters with interesting people. A child is in school from age six onward, so even if you think mothers should be at home when the children are home, are they supposed to twiddle their thumbs for 6-8 hours a day, when they could be out and being productive and fulfilled and stimulated?
___The stay-at-home-mom is a historical anomaly of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Women, like men in earlier centuries, worked, though both worked at home or pretty close to home. Mothers' "jobs" were not confined to child-rearing. The industrial revolution took both men and women out of the home (and children too), and when child-labor laws were passed, more kids were unoccupied during the day. And with the 20th century's labor-saving devices, running a home didn't require so much time. This is a sketchy account, but the notion that the stay-at-home mom, whose sole job is child-rearing, is the historical norm, is just factually in error.
___Feminism may be mostly full of crap, but it's correct on this score.
___All of this being said, I find myself wondering if your question is serious, or a put-on.