How does the current struggle by gay people for equal rights compare to the black civil rights movement?

Question

How does the current struggle by gay people for equal rights compare to the black civil rights movement of the 20th century - from a CONSTITUTIONAL and LEGAL standpoint.

What are some similarities and differences?
and
How can any form of government possibly deny equal rights to anyone just because of how they are "classified"?

Answer 1

It compares because it's a civil rights movement for a group of people who are being denied equal rights by the government. So the similarities are that it's a struggle for EQUALITY (that's the key word when comparing these issues) and the difference is that it's about sexual-orientation, not race.



Those who are opposed to equal rights for LGBT people, usually religious bigots who think the bible has any meaning on U.S. law (see above answers), often suggest that it's wrong for LGBT people to equate the LGBT rights movement to the black civil rights movement. What's being compared is the movement for equality, just like how people who were associated with the black civil rights movement were pushing for equality, just like how women's rights activists pushed for equality, just like how Native Americans pushed for equality, or at least as much as they could after having their land stolen from them.



So from a constitutional and legal stand point, it compares because it's about equality. The constitution is supposed to allow equality for all citizens, and currently, a group of people are being denied equality.



Those who oppose LGBT rights usually suggest that LGBT people don't have a right to lobby for gay rights because such rights shouldn't exist. That's what people opposed to black rights said in the past.



"They don't need extra rights, the constitution has nothing to do with race! Blacks should know their place!" ... "women don't need extra rights, the constitution has nothing to do with gender! Women belong in the kitchen!" ... and now: "gays don't need extra rights, the constitution has nothing to do with sexuality!" -- what those people don't understand is the concept of equality.



Here's some more info on the struggle for equality for LGBT people: http://www.hrc.org/issues/5517.htm

Answer 2

There are no similarities, the difference is that the Civil Rights Movement was aimed to abolish public and private acts of racial discrimination and racism against African Americans and other disadvantaged groups (based on race, gender, and disability) between the mid 1950's to the late 1960's.



The LGBT movement uses the language of civil rights to argue against the oppression of same-sex sexuality, same-sex emotional intimacy, and gender variance. The LBGT movement is not based on race, gender, or a disability, but is based on a sexual preferences. One's sexual preference has nothing to do with one's Constitutional rights.

Answer 3

the guy in you classification is stupid and would not understand lots approximately being Latino. i'm Latino, and that i never study our war to the African-American war. that's distinctive, and replaced into not as publisized using fact the Black war. yet I do would desire to assert that maximum folk do not understand that the two blacks and Latinos (Mexican people in theis case) have had their land taken far off from them: Blacks have been enslaved and bought to the Americas whilst the full western part of the united states (which replaced into then all of Mexico) replaced into signed off the the white guy. They kicked us out of our very own land, and did lynch our people in the southwest aswell as community individuals. of direction, African-American Civil Rights pass had unfastened ties with the Chicano walkouts, yet each and each has its very own history in this us of a. the two Blacks and Latinos have deep roots in the united states, yet comparing the two is misguided using fact they don't seem to be a similar. whilst blacks have had people calling them inhuman, Latinos had people calling them the coolest comparable factor. signs and indications like NO canines OR MEXICANS the place published each and each of ways up till the 1960's. You even stated which you do not lots approximately you Latino section, properly possibly you will desire to look it up. that's not common to assert Blacks had it the worst using fact how do you realize different racial communities war in u.s.? Asian individuals, Blacks, and Latinos would desire to be pals, using fact all have long gone with the aid of struggles of their history in u.s.. however comparing the hardships isn't astounding and no it is elementary to take your history far off from you.

Answer 4

They already have all the rights given by our creator recognized by the constitution. Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. And yes they have the right to marry. Any gay man can marry a woman, just like any other man can marry a woman. And conversely, any gay woman can marry a man, just like any other woman can marry a man.



Sounds equal to me.



Our founding fathers did not include a definitions section because they "believed these truths to be self evident". Marriage is between a man and a woman. So, YES gays can marry. Just not the same sex- that is not marriage. Call it something else and stop messing with the dictionary.

Answer 5

I do not recall Gays being forcibly taken from there Home land and sold into slavery. Most of there problems they have brought on to there selves. Blacks marched for the freedom to Vote and Integrated schools and lunch counters . Gays March because there trying to force there life styles on society as normal and accepted.

Answer 6

Someone will always be whining about something