Question:
Did racism start by group-think?
?
2011-05-10 15:41:53 UTC
Okay, please, I really am not trying to raise any hell here but I have a question regarding racism:

Do you think that racism started by group-think?


Do you feel as if racism could have been easily avoided had people (not naming names here) were more moral, tolerant, and accepting of others who looked different from them?


Here's what I believe to be the case, but I may be wrong.

People of group A discovered people of group B. A select few people in charge of group A came to the ultimate decision that they were superior to group B. This mentality was passed on to the rest of group A --> rendering this mentality arguably un-erasable/irreversible to present day.

Do you think that if group A of people were (for whatever reason) more tolerant, loving, accepting, and non-judgmental of group B, there would literally be no such thing as racism?

What if group A came back to the origins of their group (with some members of group B), but instead of implying/insisting to the rest of their group that people in group B were inferior to them - they did the exact opposite?

What if the people who came back with people from group A implied and insisted that the people they came back with (from group B) were not inferior to them, nor superior to them - simply equal.

Would there be a big difference today?

Humans tend to fall victim to group-think FAR TOO OFTEN. Do you think that if the initial assumption was that people from group B were equal to people from group A, there would be a lot less social problems in present day?


Do you think the latter scenario is impossible? Why or why not?



Again, not pointing fingers here, not naming names, just trying to generate some thought.

There are no right or wrong answers here. I just want opinions.

Thanks for reading!
Four answers:
Mj
2011-05-10 16:10:51 UTC
Racism is alive and well all over the world. It always will be. People prefer to be around people that are like they are. Slavery fueled it in America. Tribalism is alive and well within races. Isn't that similar?
S
2011-05-10 16:14:10 UTC
i think the elitests started it...

Actually it just might be because of the group-think, and other factors as well. You forgot to put in human traits like pride, greed, and etc. I think pride is the main cause though. Some people are just too prideful of themselves, and therefore had come to the conclusion that they are better than others and not limited to a certain race.

And yes, i think racism would most definitely be avoided if EVERYONE were more moral, tolerant, and accepting of others who looked different from them.
nunmaker
2016-12-04 08:55:25 UTC
no longer attempting to mock you, yet questions like this make me chortle. in addition to, i do no longer comprehend in case you're being severe or in simple terms enjoying a function that is been performed many, many circumstances previously here on y/a. in case you're severe you will by no skill be waiting to music the precise man or woman who all started something. break of day is onto something, tower of Babel- is an exceptionally stable commencing factor. Languages have been puzzled, human beings have been separated and divided. all of us comprehend what happens as quickly as we divide and separate. human beings grow to be paranoid, protective and sense the would desire to learn administration over the "different" because of the fact they do no longer comprehend what to anticipate from somebody diverse than themselves. for this reason they undertake assumptions and ideology approximately "the different".
Joseph the Second
2011-05-10 15:48:57 UTC
Nope. -It began by a Lot of People NOT Thinking. -And THAT goes On- to this Day. :(


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...