Does silence mean consent? Why or why not?

Question

I've heard that under the law silence means consent, and I read that if you're in a group of people talking, and you say nothing, they assume you agree with them, but is that always the case? Why assume it?

Answer 1

No, there is nothing in law that governs this.



From my perspective, silence denotes neutrality. Until a person declares their position, it should not be assumed.

Answer 2

Silence shouldn't be acceptance or consent. In the event you view this from a contract standpoint there desires to be an present and acceptance. Silence does now not furnish any form of acceptance. Because of this we've verbal and written agreements and contracts. If silence was authorised as consent then you would create any contract with any one after which sue them for no longer paying. For example, if you do not reply to this comment then i'll understand you comply with pay me $one hundred for my reply. It's unattainable in the event you ever learn this answer. In case your pc broke and also you would now not learn this i'd expect you owe me $a hundred. How silly is that? Necessities for legal contracts incorporate being an grownup age, no intellectual disability, no duress, not being below the have an effect on of alcohol or intellect altering medications. Either side of a contract must be mindful of their rights and obligations in a contract and are required to make a positive affirmation.

Answer 3

Silence does not mean consent . Some people silence themselves to think about something else , some people create lies and some people try to create a counter the other's opinion .

Answer 4

No. Consent must be declared, either verbally or in writing. It cannot be assumed.

Answer 5

I suppose the person who wants to do something, should not be prosecuted if the other person has not said no. Because the person who does something, may not mean any harm if they are unaware the other person objects.

Shaking your head or pulling a face is probably sufficient objection.