Question:
your take on vamps, real, or fake?
Sara
2011-06-04 18:31:41 UTC
now i ask this question not only for opinions, but also for proof. i myself am not a believer of vampires, or immortality. i am a person who has to see with their own eyes. i have met people who swear up and down they have seen vampires, i have met people who wont even try to believe. i have no belief. but i ask this question maybe because i am wrong. i am a firm believer in science. throughout history, many diseases were confused for vampires. other theories have led me to believe they are not real. but i ask this question to give you people who do believe to show proof, or give me your take on vampires
Ten answers:
Lord Bearclaw of Gryphon Woods
2011-06-07 22:50:18 UTC
Vampires do NOT exist.



1. Vampires, defined as a humanoid that MUST consume blood or energy to survive do not exist. Cut and paste time, as it is too much work to type this out over and over and I “recycle” my own answers instead of retyping them.



2. The human body is not designed to process blood for nutrition. There is not enough protein, carbohydrates, and fats present in blood to maintain a complex creature such as Homo Sapiens or any theorized offshoot mutations. When a human ingests food it is broken up into a bolus by chewing, then churned up in the stomach with digestive juices to form a mass called chyme. It then passes through the pylorus into the duodenum, part of the small intestine where it mixes with bile salts and secretions from the pancreas and liver which continue breaking it down on a molecular basis. The broken down nutrients pass through the wall of the intestines and into the bloodstream where they are carried to each cell or stored for later use. Indigestible bulk continues through the intestines, turning a dark brown from the bile.



3. A person physically unable to process his own food for nutrition therefore also could not process blood – it’s the same process. Ingested blood does not transmit directly to the veins anyway – it would be chemically broken down by the digestive system.



4. Theoretical ingestion of blood to supply these nutrients would therefore have to occur at least once a day, and would require the ingestion of the entire blood supply which could not happen as the stomach is far too small to hold that much liquid volume. Hold up your clenched fist – under normal conditions your stomach is about that size. Furthermore, such a mass would be difficult to pass thru the intestines as it has no fibrous bulk, would create an intestinal impaction, causing massive vomiting from the large concentration of iron present, and any “real” vampire would have to eventually expel the waste, which would come out as a black, tarry, smelly goo, just as stool does when blood is present from a upper GI bleed.



5. These humans that affect the whole “vampiric lifestyle” are NOT vampires. They are simply humans playing their own little game, in their own little fantasy world.



6. Even if a vampire feeds once a week, and his victim also becomes a vampire, that is exponential growth, with 4 iterations a month. 1st iteration: 1 makes 1, total 2. 2nd iteration: 2 make 2, total 4. 3rd iteration: 4 make 4, total 8. 4th iteration: 8 make 8, total 16. 16 vampires at the end of 1 month, 256 at the end of the 2nd month, 4096 by the end of the 3rd month, 65,536 by the end of the 4th month, 1,048,476 at the end of the 5th, and 33,572,832 vampires at the end of half a year! Do the math – vampires are a mathematical impossibility.



7.The humans who profess to be vampires are victims of an all-encompassing self induced delusion. They are as human as you or I, regardless of their claims. Note that there is absolutely no scientific or medical proof that these people derive any benefit at all from the ingestion of blood, and even worse are the so-called “psychic” vampires, because their delusion is one that they cannot substantiate with any concrete evidence at all.



8. There is no “vampire” gene. People are not “born” as vampires. When a woman goes to the hospital for prenatal care there are many tests done on mother and child, even while still in the womb, to check for many things, including genetic anomalies that result in deformities and birth defects. If such a gene existed, in today’s world with today’s technology it would have been found – we have already completely sequenced the human genome. It would also have to follow Mendel’s law of dominant/recessive gene theory. Again, the odds on that many “vampires” all escaping the notice of the medical/scientific community are so low as to be almost nonexistent. The idea that there is a global “vampire community” engaging in controlled breeding to keep the “bloodline pure” is delusional in the extreme.



9. There is no “vampire virus”. According to the “vampire websites” there are “thousands” of vampires running around. If that was so then at least one of them has ended up in a hospital for bloodwork when they became pregnant, had a bloodborne infection, was injured in a car wreck, etc, etc, ad nauseum. The anomaly would have been detected and medical science would have isolated it, studied it, applied for research grants on it, published papers on it, and turned it into the talk of the medical and scientific community, as well as making its “discoverers” celebrities and rich beyond their dreams. A virus cannot alter your DNA in such a radical fashion without killing you.
anonymous
2011-06-08 05:32:42 UTC
Okay, you want a straight up answer complete with proof?



Yes, Vampires are real.



No, they do not burn in the sun light, nor do they sparkle, so, in that sense they could not be.

The reason this was added as a trait was the connection of light to good and dark to evil.



That leads me to the next one. Vampires are not evil.

I am a Lutheran Christian, was baptized, and own a silver necklace. The belief that Vampires are evil comes from a time when Christianity began to gain control of Europe. The same thing happened to Wicca and other Pagan religions.



Now, for the one most people just can't get through their head. Vampires do not live forever. Some believe an extended life is possible, by maybe a year or two, but they do not live forever.

This idea comes from the same time period as the last one. People believed that Vampires came back from the dead, that being why they were said to live forever.



Now, let's move onto the anatomy of it, as you are probably starting to catch on that Vampires are not superhuman. Some say that the two biggest impossibilities are the ingesting of blood, and how it is spread.

I have a hole/tube in my tonsils, inherited from both my mom's side and my dad's. The tonsils are lymphatic, the circulatory and lymphatic are connected, and it never touches my stomach.

There are so many viruses out there, so many types, that no one truly knows for sure how all diseases work. Newly found viruses called retroviruses give just what is needed to prove that Vampirism is completely possible. Record the chemicals of DNA (ACTG), stretch the letters out on a piece of paper each letter being about point 10 font, keep going until you reach the end, you will be walking for a long while. That is one strand of many in a chromatid, which has a second set to make a chromosome, in each cell, there are 23 chromosomes, or pairs of chromatids, in the body, there are billions of cells, in the testing lab, there are at most, 20 scientists and a computer that looks through the DNA for them, skipping the things it isn't looking for.

One virus can sneak through and change the DNA. Just like HIV, HERV, the supposed vaccine for HIV, can go unnoticed until it is ready. Unlike HIV, HERV does not attack, but changes the cells. Retroviruses change the DNA makeup of the victim, giving them what would be called an Adrenaline rush, stealing the blood away from the parts that don't need it, at the cost of quicker spent blood. This virus also found a way to, over time, adapt the person to the ingestion most likely many ways. For anyone who has read up on why it's nearly impossible to prevent HIV, you understand that HIV evolves quickly and efficiently, just as HERV. This is my proof.



** Name HERV is not the accepted term, but is used in a few tests on the subject.
Sarg
2011-06-05 01:38:53 UTC
Yeah they're real, not the immortal ones of Legend of course. Count Dracula was based on some sadistic countess from the 1600s I beleive. She would kidnap young peasant girl and bite their arms to drink their blood, she would also bathe in the blood of these girls because she beleived it kept her young.



I don't remember all the details I'm afraid but I beleive in the end her servants were executed for helping her and being royalty they could not put her to death, so they sentenced her to a life of house arrest in her castle, she was never allowed to leave her home again.



"Vampire" clans primarily live in the countryside in states like kentucky deep in the woods, they stalk people and prey on lone travelers and old people with no friends or family left alive. Scary stuff



Edit: I did a quick google and found out the countess' name was Elizabeth Bathory, you can read a wiki page on her here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_B%C3%A1thory
anonymous
2011-06-05 01:51:02 UTC
i think that is a 50/50 posibility. that elizabeth lady was kind of like a vampire. i dont know. it could be possible.
Stranfield Thistletremor
2011-06-05 01:32:20 UTC
Emo douchebaggery.
Steve
2011-06-05 01:33:18 UTC
they were made cool by "Interview with a Vampire", but now turned tweeny with "Twilight"
Cornelius
2011-06-05 01:33:33 UTC
theyre mythical beings from folklore
PB
2011-06-05 01:32:51 UTC
no, there are no vampires in the mythical sense.
Mikey
2011-06-05 01:32:45 UTC
99% chance of being fake, 1% chance of being real.



Doubt it, but anything's possible, right?
anonymous
2011-06-05 01:34:35 UTC
People are monkeys.


This content was originally posted on Y! Answers, a Q&A website that shut down in 2021.
Loading...